will: be possible in material universe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents order
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, tv show
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tonight
Weight: 0.31
, game show
Weight: 0.31
, happy hour
Weight: 0.31
, memorial day
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be possible in material universe 1.00
be possible 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, be possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(will, be possible in material universe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, be possible)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(action, be possible)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, be possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(will, be possible in material universe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(will, be possible in material universe)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(will, be possible)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(will, be possible)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(will, be possible)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(will, be possible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(will, be possible in material universe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(will, be possible in material universe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, be possible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(will, be possible in material universe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, be possible)