will: has quality advantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents order
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, tv show
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tonight
Weight: 0.31
, game show
Weight: 0.31
, happy hour
Weight: 0.31
, memorial day
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality advantage 1.00
be evolutionary advantage 0.79
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(will, has quality advantage)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(will, be evolutionary advantage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(will, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(will, be evolutionary advantage)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(will, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(will, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(will, be evolutionary advantage)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(will, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(will, be evolutionary advantage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(will, has quality advantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(will, has quality advantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(will, has quality advantage)