:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
fail |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(machine, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(windmill, fail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(windmill, fail)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(machine, fail)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(machine, fail)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(crane, fail)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(machine, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(windmill, fail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(windmill, fail)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(crane, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(crane, fail)
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(windmill, fail)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(windmill, fail)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(machine, fail)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(crane, fail)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(windmill, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(machine, fail)