windmill: have 2 blades

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, machine
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings turbine
Weight: 0.35
, solar wind
Weight: 0.34
, lighthouse
Weight: 0.33
, electric motor
Weight: 0.33
, crane
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have 2 blades 1.00
have 3 blades 1.00
have three blades 0.96
has physical part blades 0.92
have holes in blades 0.90
have thin blades 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(turbine, have 3 blades)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turbine, have three blades)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(turbine, have three blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(turbine, have three blades)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(turbine, have 3 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(turbine, have 3 blades)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(windmill, have 2 blades)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have 3 blades)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have three blades)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have thin blades)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have holes in blades)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(windmill, have 3 blades)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(windmill, have 3 blades)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(windmill, have 3 blades)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(windmill, have three blades)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(windmill, have three blades)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(windmill, have holes in blades)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(windmill, have holes in blades)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(windmill, have holes in blades)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(windmill, have three blades)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(windmill, have thin blades)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(windmill, have thin blades)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(windmill, have thin blades)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(windmill, have 2 blades)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(turbine, have 3 blades)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(windmill, have 2 blades) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(turbine, have three blades)