window: be considered masterpiece

Related concepts

Parents	light source Weight: 0.63 , operating system Weight: 0.62 , location Weight: 0.62 , bedroom Weight: 0.62
Siblings	rear window Weight: 0.83 , front door Weight: 0.78 , window pane Weight: 0.71 , wall Weight: 0.65 , windshield Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered masterpiece	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(window, be considered masterpiece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(rear window, be considered masterpiece)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(window, be considered masterpiece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(rear window, be considered masterpiece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(rear window, be considered masterpiece)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(window, be considered masterpiece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(window, be considered masterpiece)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(window, be considered masterpiece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(window, be considered masterpiece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(window, be considered masterpiece)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(window, be considered masterpiece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(window, be considered masterpiece)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(window, be considered masterpiece) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(rear window, be considered masterpiece)