window: be double hang

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light source
Weight: 0.63
, location
Weight: 0.62
, bedroom
Weight: 0.62
, frame
Weight: 0.61
Siblings front door
Weight: 0.78
, window pane
Weight: 0.71
, wall
Weight: 0.65
, door
Weight: 0.64
, tab
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be double hang 1.00
be hang 0.85
be used to hang picture 0.78
be used to place to hang art work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(door, be hang)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wall, be used to hang picture)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wall, be used to place to hang art work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(door, be hang)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(door, be hang)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(wall, be used to place to hang art work)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wall, be used to place to hang art work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wall, be used to hang picture)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(wall, be used to hang picture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(window, be double hang)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(window, be double hang)

Typical implies Plausible

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(window, be double hang)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(door, be hang)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wall, be used to hang picture)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(window, be double hang)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wall, be used to place to hang art work)