window: is glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light source
Weight: 0.63
, operating system
Weight: 0.62
, location
Weight: 0.62
, bedroom
Weight: 0.62
Siblings rear window
Weight: 0.83
, front door
Weight: 0.78
, window pane
Weight: 0.71
, wall
Weight: 0.65
, windshield
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is glass 1.00
be made of glass 0.95
be made from glass 0.93
be made of frosted glass 0.85
have made of frosted glass panes 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(window pane, be made of glass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(window pane, be made of glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(window pane, be made of glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(window, is glass)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(window, be made of glass)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(window, be made from glass)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(window, be made of glass)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(window, be made from glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(window, be made from glass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(window, be made of glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(window, be made from glass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(window, be made of glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(window, is glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(window, is glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(window, is glass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(window pane, be made of glass)