window: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents light source
Weight: 0.63
, operating system
Weight: 0.62
, location
Weight: 0.62
, bedroom
Weight: 0.62
Siblings rear window
Weight: 0.83
, front door
Weight: 0.78
, window pane
Weight: 0.71
, wall
Weight: 0.65
, windshield
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was created 0.83
was was has designed 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(window, was developed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(window, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(window, was developed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(window, was created)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(window, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(window, was created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(window, was developed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(window, was created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(window, was developed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(window, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(window, was developed)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(window, was developed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(window, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(window, was developed)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(window, was developed)