wine bottle: has physical part bottom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents glass bottle
Weight: 0.86
, glass
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.73
, container
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings shot glass
Weight: 0.37
, bottled water
Weight: 0.37
, bottle opener
Weight: 0.36
, broken glass
Weight: 0.36
, jug
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part bottom 1.00
has physical part quick 0.80
has physical part bottoms 0.79
have dents in bottom 0.77
have raised bottom 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(glass bottle, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine bottle, has physical part bottom)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, has physical part quick)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(glass bottle, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, has physical part bottom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(wine bottle, has physical part bottom)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, has physical part quick)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, has physical part quick)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(wine bottle, has physical part quick)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have dents in bottom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, have dents in bottom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(wine bottle, have dents in bottom)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have raised bottom)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine bottle, has physical part quick)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(wine bottle, have raised bottom)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have dents in bottom)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, have raised bottom)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have raised bottom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, has physical part bottom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine bottle, has physical part bottom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(glass bottle, has physical part quick)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wine bottle, has physical part bottom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(glass bottle, has physical part quick)