wine list: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
be used to restaurant 0.99
be at resturant 0.85
be used to view available wine at restaurant 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(wine list, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(wine list, be used to restaurant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(wine list, be used to restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wine list, be used to view available wine at restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(wine list, be at resturant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wine list, be at resturant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wine list, be used to view available wine at restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wine list, be at resturant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wine list, be at resturant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine list, be used to restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wine list, be used to restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(wine list, be used to view available wine at restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wine list, be used to view available wine at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(wine list, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wine list, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wine list, be at restaurant)