wine: be healthier than white wine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be healthier than white wine 1.00
be healthier than wine 0.98
be better than white wine 0.94
be better than wine 0.92
be more expensive than white wine 0.91
be typically sweeter than red wine 0.88
be typically sweeter than wine 0.86
have higher proof than white wine 0.86
get out red wine 0.85
get out wine 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than wine)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than wine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(red wine, be healthier than wine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(red wine, be better than wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than wine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(red wine, have higher proof than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(wine, be healthier than white wine)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(wine, be better than white wine)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white wine)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than white wine)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(wine, get out red wine)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, get out red wine)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(wine, get out red wine)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white wine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wine, get out red wine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red wine, be healthier than wine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than wine)