wine: bottles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
bottles 1.00
is bottles 1.00
be in bottles 0.99
be in glass bottles 0.94
be in green bottles 0.92
be in dark bottles 0.91
be sold in bottles 0.91
be in bottle 0.90
be in clear bottles 0.90
be in 750 ml bottles 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be in green bottles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be in dark bottles)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be in bottles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red wine, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(red wine, be in bottles)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(red wine, be in green bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red wine, be in green bottles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red wine, be in dark bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(red wine, be in dark bottles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(wine, bottles)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wine, be in bottles)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, is bottles)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wine, is bottles)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wine, be in bottles)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wine, be in green bottles)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wine, be in bottles)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wine, be in bottle)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(wine, be in bottles)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wine, be in green bottles)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wine, be in bottle)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wine, be in bottle)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(wine, be in green bottles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(wine, is bottles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(wine, be in bottle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(wine, is bottles)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(wine, be in green bottles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, bottles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wine, bottles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(red wine, be in bottles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red wine, be in green bottles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wine, bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(red wine, be in dark bottles)