wine: have alcohol

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have alcohol 1.00
is 14 alcohol 0.99
have more alcohol than beer 0.92
is drinking 0.81
be more expensive than liquor 0.79
be drunk different from other drunks 0.79
is different drunk 0.79
be drunk different from drunks 0.79
is drunk 0.78
get drunk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(red wine, is drunk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(red wine, is drunk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(red wine, is drunk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(wine, have alcohol)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wine, have more alcohol than beer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(wine, have more alcohol than beer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(wine, have more alcohol than beer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wine, is drinking)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wine, have more alcohol than beer)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wine, have alcohol)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wine, have alcohol)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wine, have alcohol)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(red wine, is drunk)