wing: be a part of bird

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.56
, system
Weight: 0.54
, team
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fuselage
Weight: 0.44
, arch
Weight: 0.32
, side
Weight: 0.31
, ligament
Weight: 0.31
, circle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of bird 1.00
be at bird 0.97
be used to bird 0.97
be a part of bird body 0.94
be used to support bird 0.91
be at airplane and bird 0.89
be at bird or man-made fly machine 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(wing, be a part of bird)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(wing, be at bird)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wing, be used to support bird)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wing, be at bird)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wing, be used to bird)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(wing, be used to bird)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wing, be used to bird)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(wing, be at airplane and bird)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wing, be at bird)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wing, be a part of bird body)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wing, be used to support bird)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wing, be a part of bird body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wing, be used to support bird)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wing, be a part of bird body)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(wing, be at bird or man-made fly machine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wing, be at airplane and bird)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wing, be at bird or man-made fly machine)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wing, be at airplane and bird)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(wing, be a part of bird body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wing, be at bird or man-made fly machine)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wing, be at bird)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(wing, be used to bird)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wing, be at airplane and bird)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wing, be at bird or man-made fly machine)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wing, be used to support bird)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wing, be a part of bird)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(wing, be a part of bird)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wing, be a part of bird)