wing: be illegal in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.56
, body part
Weight: 0.56
, system
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fuselage
Weight: 0.44
, arch
Weight: 0.32
, nose
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in australia 1.00
be in usa 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(wing, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(wing, be illegal in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wing, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wing, be in usa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(wing, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(wing, be in usa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wing, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wing, be in usa)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wing, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wing, be in usa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wing, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wing, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wing, be illegal in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(wing, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wing, be illegal in australia)