winner: be in hunger games

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loser
Weight: 0.67
, accolade
Weight: 0.65
, runner
Weight: 0.62
, favorite
Weight: 0.60
Siblings english channel
Weight: 0.51
, joes
Weight: 0.45
, winning
Weight: 0.43
, filly
Weight: 0.40
, victor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hunger games 1.00
is hungry 0.76
play video games 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(loser, play video games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winner, be in hunger games)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(loser, play video games)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(loser, play video games)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(loser, play video games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(winner, be in hunger games)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(winner, be in hunger games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winner, be in hunger games)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(winner, be in hunger games)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(loser, play video games)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(winner, be in hunger games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(loser, play video games)