winner: take work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loser
Weight: 0.67
, accolade
Weight: 0.65
, runner
Weight: 0.62
, favorite
Weight: 0.60
Siblings english channel
Weight: 0.51
, joes
Weight: 0.45
, winning
Weight: 0.43
, filly
Weight: 0.40
, victor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
take work 1.00
want take 0.87
work 0.86
work on clickydraft 0.84
be take system important 0.81
take system 0.80
go in ingolstadt 0.79
go to orkneys 0.79
go to ingolstadt 0.79
go to chamounix 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(favorite, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(winner, take work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(favorite, work on clickydraft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(winner, take work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(favorite, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(favorite, work on clickydraft)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(favorite, work on clickydraft)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(favorite, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(victor, go to chamounix)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(victor, go to ingolstadt)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(victor, go to orkneys)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(victor, go in ingolstadt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(favorite, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(winner, take work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(favorite, work on clickydraft) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(winner, take work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(victor, go to ingolstadt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(victor, go to ingolstadt)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(victor, go in ingolstadt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(victor, go in ingolstadt)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(victor, go to orkneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(victor, go to orkneys)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(victor, go to chamounix) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(victor, go to chamounix)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(winner, take work)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(winner, be take system important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(winner, take system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(winner, take system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(winner, be take system important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(winner, take system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(winner, be take system important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(winner, take system)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(winner, be take system important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(winner, take work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(favorite, work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(favorite, work on clickydraft)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(victor, go to ingolstadt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(victor, go in ingolstadt)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(victor, go to orkneys)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(victor, go to chamounix)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(favorite, work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(winner, take work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(favorite, work on clickydraft)