winnipeg: have home ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents canada
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.54
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.35
, alberta
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, quebec
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have home ice 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, have home ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(montreal, have home ice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(winnipeg, have home ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(montreal, have home ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(montreal, have home ice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(winnipeg, have home ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(winnipeg, have home ice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(winnipeg, have home ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(winnipeg, have home ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, have home ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(winnipeg, have home ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(winnipeg, have home ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, have home ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(montreal, have home ice)