wire: be good making

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, television show
Weight: 0.57
, drama
Weight: 0.57
, element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings extension cord
Weight: 0.63
, pipe
Weight: 0.61
, cord
Weight: 0.60
, strand
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good making 1.00
be made 0.86
be needed make 0.80
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wire, be good making)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wire, be good making)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(element, be made)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wire, be good making)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(element, be made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(drama, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(element, be made)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(drama, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cord, be made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(element, be made)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wire, be good making)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wire, be good making)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drama, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wire, be good making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cord, be made)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cord, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wire, be good making)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wire, be made)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(wire, be made)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(wire, be made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(wire, be needed make)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wire, be needed make)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(wire, be needed make)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wire, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(wire, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wire, be made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wire, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wire, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wire, be needed make)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wire, be good making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(element, be made)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(drama, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cord, be made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(element, be made)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(drama, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(wire, be good making)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)