wisconsin: is conservative bloggers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is conservative bloggers 1.00
is conservative bloggers stupid 0.97
is bloggers 0.94
is bloggers stupid 0.91
is liberal 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(university, is liberal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(university, is liberal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(university, is liberal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is liberal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(university, is liberal)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(minneapolis, is liberal)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is liberal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers stupid)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bloggers stupid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers stupid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers stupid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is bloggers stupid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is liberal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bloggers stupid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers stupid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is liberal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is liberal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bloggers stupid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is liberal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(university, is liberal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is liberal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(wisconsin, is conservative bloggers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(university, is liberal)