wisconsin: is ranked

Property	Similarity
is ranked	1.00
is ranked high	0.96
is ranked ahead	0.90
is ranked ahead of state	0.89
is ranked ahead of ohio state	0.79

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is ranked high)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is ranked ahead of state)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is ranked ahead)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is ranked ahead of ohio state)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(wisconsin, is ranked high)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(wisconsin, is ranked ahead)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is ranked high)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(wisconsin, is ranked ahead of state)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(wisconsin, is ranked high)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is ranked ahead)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(wisconsin, is ranked ahead of ohio state)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is ranked ahead of state)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(wisconsin, is ranked ahead)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is ranked ahead of ohio state)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(wisconsin, is ranked ahead of state)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Typical(wisconsin, is ranked) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(wisconsin, is ranked ahead of ohio state)

Parents	area Weight: 0.58 , state Weight: 0.57 , university Weight: 0.56 , republican Weight: 0.56
Siblings	ohio Weight: 0.66 , pennsylvania Weight: 0.60 , minneapolis Weight: 0.55 , frozen custard Weight: 0.46 , michigan Weight: 0.35

wisconsin: is ranked

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible