wisconsin: was nicknamed badger state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was nicknamed badger state 1.00
be called badger state 0.91
be known as badger state 0.91
is badger state 0.89
was nicknamed bager state 0.89
is badgers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is badger state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is badger state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is badger state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be called badger state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be called badger state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be called badger state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is badger state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is badgers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be called badger state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, was nicknamed bager state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, was nicknamed bager state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, was nicknamed bager state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is badgers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(wisconsin, was nicknamed bager state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be known as badger state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be known as badger state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be known as badger state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is badgers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be known as badger state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is badgers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(wisconsin, was nicknamed badger state)