:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(irony, is funny)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(humor, is funny)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(laugh, is funny)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wit, is funny)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wit, is funny)
Typical implies Plausible
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wit, is funny)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(irony, is funny)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(laugh, is funny)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wit, is funny)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(humor, is funny)