witness: be to will necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defendant
Weight: 0.65
, trial
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.61
Siblings policeman
Weight: 0.63
, source
Weight: 0.63
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.61
, attorney
Weight: 0.61
, hearing
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to will necessary 1.00
is necessary 0.89
be required give 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hearing, is necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hearing, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hearing, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(witness, be to will necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(witness, is necessary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(witness, is necessary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(witness, is necessary)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(witness, is necessary)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(witness, be required give)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(witness, be required give)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(witness, be required give)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(witness, be required give)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(witness, be to will necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(witness, be to will necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(witness, be to will necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(hearing, is necessary)