wolf: growl

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.72
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings husky
Weight: 0.46
, dingo
Weight: 0.46
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, elk
Weight: 0.39
, cougar
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
growl 1.00
howl 0.82
howl at moon 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cougar, growl)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dingo, howl)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cougar, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cougar, growl)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(dingo, howl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dingo, howl)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(wolf, growl)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(wolf, howl at moon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(wolf, howl at moon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wolf, howl at moon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wolf, howl)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wolf, howl at moon)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wolf, growl)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wolf, growl)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cougar, growl)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wolf, growl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dingo, howl)