wolf: turn in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings husky
Weight: 0.46
, dingo
Weight: 0.46
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, elk
Weight: 0.39
, cougar
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
turn in winter 1.00
survive in winter 0.87
adapt in winter 0.86
survive in cold weather 0.80
survive long winters 0.79
survive winters 0.79
survive in weather 0.77
live in tundra weather 0.77
live in hot weather 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(elk, survive in winter)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cougar, survive in winter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cougar, survive in winter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cougar, survive in winter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(elk, survive in winter)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(elk, survive in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(wolf, turn in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wolf, survive in winter)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(wolf, adapt in winter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wolf, survive in winter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wolf, survive in winter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wolf, adapt in winter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(wolf, adapt in winter)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wolf, survive in winter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wolf, adapt in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wolf, turn in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wolf, turn in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cougar, survive in winter)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wolf, turn in winter)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(elk, survive in winter)