wood: be solid

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
, lumber
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.63
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be solid 1.00
be strong 0.85
be strong and hard 0.83
make excellent build material 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(steel, be strong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(steel, be strong)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(steel, be strong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(steel, be strong and hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(wood, be solid)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wood, make excellent build material)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wood, make excellent build material)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(wood, make excellent build material)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wood, make excellent build material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wood, be solid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wood, be solid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steel, be strong and hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wood, be solid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(steel, be strong)