wood: is good material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.67
, substrate
Weight: 0.63
, fence
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.40
, lumber
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good material 1.00
is material 0.95
be as material 0.93
be best material in fortnite 0.93
is good building material 0.92
is useful material 0.92
be as material used 0.91
be considered material 0.91
is building material 0.88
use than other material 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(timber, is good building material)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(timber, is building material)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(timber, is material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(timber, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(timber, is material)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(timber, is good building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(timber, is good building material)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(timber, is building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(timber, is building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(wood, is good material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, is good material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(timber, is material)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(timber, is building material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wood, is good material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(timber, is good building material)