woodpecker: be protected by federal law

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chickadee
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protected by federal law 1.00
is protected 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be protected by federal law)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, be protected by federal law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(woodpecker, be protected by federal law)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(woodpecker, is protected)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, is protected)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(woodpecker, is protected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, is protected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be protected by federal law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be protected by federal law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(woodpecker, be protected by federal law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)