woodpecker: eat ants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chickadee
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat ants 1.00
eat 0.81
eat hummingbird food 0.80
eat chicks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(woodpecker, eat ants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creature, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(creature, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lizard, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, eat ants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(lizard, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(lizard, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(woodpecker, eat ants)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, eat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(woodpecker, eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, eat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(woodpecker, eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, eat ants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(woodpecker, eat ants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lizard, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(woodpecker, eat ants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)