woodpecker: hammer on trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chickadee
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
hammer on trees 1.00
trees 0.83
need trees 0.81
put holes in birch trees 0.81
put acorns in trees 0.80
make holes in trees 0.79
remove bark from trees 0.78
tap on trees 0.78
live in dead trees 0.77
drum on trees 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(woodpecker, hammer on trees)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, make holes in trees)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(woodpecker, make holes in trees)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, put holes in birch trees)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, remove bark from trees)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, make holes in trees)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(woodpecker, put holes in birch trees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, live in dead trees)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need trees)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(woodpecker, make holes in trees)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(woodpecker, remove bark from trees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(woodpecker, put holes in birch trees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, put holes in birch trees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(woodpecker, put acorns in trees)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(woodpecker, remove bark from trees)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, remove bark from trees)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(woodpecker, live in dead trees)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(woodpecker, live in dead trees)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, put acorns in trees)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, live in dead trees)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, put acorns in trees)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need trees)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(woodpecker, put acorns in trees)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need trees)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(woodpecker, need trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, hammer on trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(woodpecker, hammer on trees)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(woodpecker, hammer on trees)