woodpecker: tap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chickadee
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
tap 1.00
tap on metal 0.86
tap on trees 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(woodpecker, tap)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, tap on metal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(woodpecker, tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(woodpecker, tap on metal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(woodpecker, tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, tap on metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(woodpecker, tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(woodpecker, tap on metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(woodpecker, tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(woodpecker, tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, tap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(woodpecker, tap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(woodpecker, tap)