wool: be grown

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, fiber
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cashmere
Weight: 0.56
, shetland
Weight: 0.49
, tweed
Weight: 0.45
, silk
Weight: 0.37
, cotton
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be grown 1.00
grow 0.85
be grown in climates 0.85
be grown in warm climates 0.81
be grown in mexico 0.80
be grown in maharashtra 0.80
were growing linked 0.79
be mainly grown in plateau region 0.78
grow well in south 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be grown in mexico)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be grown)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cotton, grow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cotton, be grown)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cotton, be grown)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cotton, grow)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cotton, grow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cotton, be grown in mexico)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cotton, be grown in mexico)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wool, be grown)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wool, grow)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(wool, grow)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(wool, grow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wool, grow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wool, be grown)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(wool, be grown)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cotton, grow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cotton, be grown)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(wool, be grown)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cotton, be grown in mexico)