wool: be important to fashion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, fiber
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cashmere
Weight: 0.56
, shetland
Weight: 0.49
, tweed
Weight: 0.45
, silk
Weight: 0.37
, cotton
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to fashion 1.00
be important to australian fashion 0.84
be good for clothing 0.75
be better for clothing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(silk, be good for clothing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be better for clothing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(cotton, be better for clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cotton, be better for clothing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(silk, be good for clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(silk, be good for clothing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(wool, be important to fashion)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(wool, be good for clothing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(wool, be good for clothing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wool, be good for clothing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wool, be good for clothing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wool, be important to fashion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wool, be important to fashion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(silk, be good for clothing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wool, be important to fashion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cotton, be better for clothing)