wool: shrink in hot water biochemistry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, fiber
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cashmere
Weight: 0.56
, shetland
Weight: 0.49
, tweed
Weight: 0.45
, silk
Weight: 0.37
, cotton
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
shrink in hot water biochemistry 1.00
shrink in hot water 0.84
shrink in wash 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cotton, shrink in wash)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cotton, shrink in wash)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cotton, shrink in wash)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(wool, shrink in hot water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(wool, shrink in hot water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wool, shrink in hot water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(wool, shrink in hot water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(wool, shrink in wash)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(wool, shrink in wash)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wool, shrink in wash)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wool, shrink in wash)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(wool, shrink in hot water biochemistry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cotton, shrink in wash)