word: be a part of language

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
, symbol
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lyric
Weight: 0.70
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.69
, cunt
Weight: 0.68
, proper noun
Weight: 0.67
, shit
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of language 1.00
be defined as basis of language 0.81
erase language barrier in communication 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(symbol, erase language barrier in communication)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(word, be a part of language)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(symbol, erase language barrier in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(symbol, erase language barrier in communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(symbol, erase language barrier in communication)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(word, be a part of language)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(word, be a part of language)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(word, be defined as basis of language)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(word, be defined as basis of language)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(word, be defined as basis of language)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(word, be defined as basis of language)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(word, be a part of language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(word, be a part of language)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(symbol, erase language barrier in communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(word, be a part of language)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(symbol, erase language barrier in communication)