word: be use together to communicate complex idea

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
, symbol
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lyric
Weight: 0.70
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.69
, cunt
Weight: 0.68
, proper noun
Weight: 0.67
, shit
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be use together to communicate complex idea 1.00
be used to visually communicate idea 0.86
be used to communicate with 0.86
be used to communicate thought 0.86
be used to communicate 0.85
connect two piece of paper together 0.83
be interpret in different way 0.78
be use in some form of communication 0.78
has complex mean 0.77
be used to represent idea or thought 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(symbol, be used to visually communicate idea)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, connect two piece of paper together)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(symbol, be used to represent idea or thought)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(symbol, has complex mean)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tool, connect two piece of paper together)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(symbol, be used to visually communicate idea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(symbol, has complex mean)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(symbol, be used to represent idea or thought)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tool, connect two piece of paper together)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(symbol, has complex mean)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(symbol, be used to visually communicate idea)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(symbol, be used to represent idea or thought)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(symbol, be used to visually communicate idea)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(symbol, be used to represent idea or thought)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, connect two piece of paper together)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(symbol, has complex mean)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(word, be used to communicate with)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(word, be used to communicate thought)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(word, be used to communicate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate thought)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate with)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(word, be used to communicate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(word, be use in some form of communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(word, be interpret in different way)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(word, be use in some form of communication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(word, be interpret in different way)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(word, be used to communicate with)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(word, be used to communicate thought)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to communicate with)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to communicate thought)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(word, be used to communicate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to communicate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, be interpret in different way)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(word, be interpret in different way)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(word, be use in some form of communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(word, be use in some form of communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(symbol, be used to visually communicate idea)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(symbol, be used to represent idea or thought)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(symbol, has complex mean)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tool, connect two piece of paper together)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(symbol, be used to visually communicate idea)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(symbol, be used to represent idea or thought)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(symbol, has complex mean)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(word, be use together to communicate complex idea)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tool, connect two piece of paper together)