word: be very very powerful

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents message
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
, symbol
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lyric
Weight: 0.70
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.69
, cunt
Weight: 0.68
, proper noun
Weight: 0.67
, shit
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very very powerful 1.00
be very important 0.85
be very important to human 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(symbol, be very important to human)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(word, be very very powerful)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tool, be very important)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(word, be very very powerful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tool, be very important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(symbol, be very important to human)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(symbol, be very important to human)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tool, be very important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tool, be very important)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(word, be very very powerful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(symbol, be very important to human)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(word, be very very powerful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(word, be very very powerful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(word, be very very powerful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(word, be very very powerful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(symbol, be very important to human)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, be very important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(symbol, be very important to human)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(word, be very very powerful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, be very important)