work: be related to power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hard work
Weight: 0.61
, depth
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.60
, adventure
Weight: 0.60
Siblings think
Weight: 0.65
, sewing
Weight: 0.64
, sacrifice
Weight: 0.63
, trust
Weight: 0.63
, education
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to power 1.00
be related to energy 0.86
be related to potential energy 0.83
be related 0.82
is related 0.82
be related force 0.81
have same unit as energy 0.77
be related to conservation of mechanical energy 0.76
have unit as energy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(job, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(work, be related to power)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(depth, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(work, be related to power)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(depth, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(job, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(depth, be related)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(job, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(trust, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(job, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(work, be related to power)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(depth, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(work, be related to power)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(trust, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(trust, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(work, be related to power)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(work, be related to energy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(work, be related to energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(work, be related to energy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(work, be related force)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(work, be related force)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(work, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(work, be related to conservation of mechanical energy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(work, be related force)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(work, be related)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(work, be related force)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(work, be related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(work, be related to conservation of mechanical energy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(work, be related to conservation of mechanical energy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to energy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to conservation of mechanical energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(work, be related to power)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, be related)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(job, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(trust, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(depth, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(work, be related to power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(job, be related)