worker: demand raise

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
demand raise 1.00
receive raise 0.80
wait for raise 0.80
demand good work condition 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(worker, demand raise)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(worker, wait for raise)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(worker, receive raise)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(worker, demand good work condition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(worker, receive raise)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(worker, wait for raise)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(worker, demand good work condition)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(worker, wait for raise)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(worker, receive raise)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(worker, demand good work condition)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(worker, demand good work condition)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(worker, wait for raise)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(worker, receive raise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(worker, demand raise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(worker, demand raise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(worker, demand raise)