worker: spend time on project

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.60
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.88
, nurse
Weight: 0.71
, janitor
Weight: 0.71
, bus driver
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
spend time on project 1.00
be at work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(employee, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(worker, spend time on project)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(employee, be at work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(employee, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(worker, spend time on project)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(worker, spend time on project)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(worker, be at work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(worker, be at work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(worker, be at work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(worker, be at work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(worker, spend time on project)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(worker, spend time on project)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(employee, be at work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(worker, spend time on project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(employee, be at work)