:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(scrape, scab)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(blister, scab)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(scrape, scab)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(scrape, scab)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wound, scab)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wound, scab)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(wound, scab)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wound, scab)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(blister, scab)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(wound, form scabs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(scrape, scab)