writer: use metaphors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fan
Weight: 0.66
, philosopher
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.65
, scholar
Weight: 0.65
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, novelist
Weight: 0.73
, critic
Weight: 0.72
, journalist
Weight: 0.72
, poet
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
use metaphors 1.00
use similes 0.84
use simile 0.82
use noun phrases 0.80
use phrases 0.79
use idioms 0.79
use words 0.78
use figurative language 0.78
use brainly figurative language 0.78
use adjectives 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(scholar, use words) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(writer, use metaphors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(scholar, use words)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(scholar, use words)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(author, use similes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(poet, use similes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(author, use figurative language)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(author, use adjectives)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(author, use metaphors)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(poet, use metaphors)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(poet, use figurative language)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(poet, use words)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(author, use words)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(scholar, use words) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(writer, use metaphors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(poet, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(poet, use metaphors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(author, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(author, use metaphors)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(author, use words) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(author, use words)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(poet, use words) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(poet, use words)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(poet, use similes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(poet, use similes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(poet, use figurative language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(poet, use figurative language)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(author, use similes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(author, use similes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(author, use adjectives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(author, use adjectives)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(author, use figurative language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(author, use figurative language)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(writer, use metaphors)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(writer, use similes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(writer, use figurative language)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(writer, use figurative language)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(writer, use figurative language)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(writer, use similes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(writer, use similes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(writer, use similes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(writer, use figurative language)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(writer, use metaphors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(scholar, use words)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(poet, use metaphors)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(author, use metaphors)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(poet, use words)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(author, use words)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(poet, use figurative language)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(author, use adjectives)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(poet, use similes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(author, use similes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(author, use figurative language)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(writer, use metaphors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(scholar, use words)