writer: use symbolism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fan
Weight: 0.66
, philosopher
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.65
, scholar
Weight: 0.65
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, novelist
Weight: 0.73
, critic
Weight: 0.72
, journalist
Weight: 0.72
, poet
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
use symbolism 1.00
use allusions 0.77
use symbols in literature 0.77
use visual rhetoric 0.77
use imagery in literature 0.76
use imagery 0.76
use visual imagery 0.76
use motifs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(author, use allusions)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(author, use symbolism)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(poet, use imagery)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(author, use imagery)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(author, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(author, use symbolism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(author, use imagery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(author, use imagery)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(poet, use imagery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(poet, use imagery)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(author, use allusions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(author, use allusions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(writer, use symbolism)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbols in literature)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(writer, use imagery in literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(writer, use imagery in literature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(writer, use imagery in literature)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(writer, use imagery in literature)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(writer, use symbols in literature)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(writer, use symbols in literature)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(writer, use symbols in literature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(writer, use symbolism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(author, use symbolism)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(poet, use imagery)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(author, use imagery)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writer, use symbolism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(author, use allusions)