:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(writer, write poem)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(poet, write)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(writer, write poem)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(poet, write)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poet, write)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(writer, write poem)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(writer, write)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(writer, write poem)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(writer, write)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writer, write poem)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(writer, write)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(writer, write poem)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(writer, write)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(writer, write poem)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(poet, write)