writing: be for computer more difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for computer more difficult 1.00
be for computer 0.88
is difficult 0.84
be like is somewhat computer programming 0.80
is hard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(work, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(production, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(matter, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(matter, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(matter, is difficult)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(matter, is hard)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(production, is hard)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(work, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(matter, is difficult)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(matter, is hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(production, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(work, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(grammar, is difficult)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(reading, is difficult)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(reading, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(grammar, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(matter, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(work, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(production, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(matter, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(grammar, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(grammar, is hard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(reading, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(reading, is difficult)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(grammar, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grammar, is difficult)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(reading, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(reading, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(writing, be for computer more difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(writing, be for computer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(writing, be for computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(writing, be for computer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(writing, be like is somewhat computer programming)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(matter, is difficult)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(matter, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(production, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(work, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(grammar, is difficult)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(reading, is difficult)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(grammar, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(reading, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(matter, is difficult)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(matter, is hard)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(production, is hard)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(writing, be for computer more difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(work, is hard)