writing: be in history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in history 1.00
be important in history 0.96
be important to history 0.95
be important in early history of china 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, be in history)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, be important in history)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, be important to history)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, be important in history)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, be important to history)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(writing, be important in history)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(writing, be important to history)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(writing, be important in early history of china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(writing, be important in early history of china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(writing, be important in early history of china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(writing, be important in history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(writing, be important to history)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, be important in early history of china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(writing, be in history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(writing, be in history)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(writing, be in history)