writing: was different from hieroglyphics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was different from hieroglyphics 1.00
be called hieroglyphic 0.83
was on papyrus better 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(writing, was different from hieroglyphics)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(writing, be called hieroglyphic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(writing, was on papyrus better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(writing, be called hieroglyphic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(writing, was on papyrus better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(writing, be called hieroglyphic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(writing, be called hieroglyphic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(writing, was on papyrus better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(writing, was on papyrus better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(writing, was different from hieroglyphics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(writing, was different from hieroglyphics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(writing, was different from hieroglyphics)