writing: was important in ancient civilization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in ancient civilization 1.00
was important in civilization 0.96
was important to civilization 0.96
was important to ancient civilizations 0.94
be to civilization 0.93
was invented in ancient civilizations 0.92
was os important in ancient civilizations 0.90
was important in civilizations 0.89
was intended in ancient civilizations 0.89
was important to civilizations 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(writing, was important to civilization)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, was important to civilization)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to civilization)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(writing, was invented in ancient civilizations)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to civilization)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important to ancient civilizations)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(writing, was intended in ancient civilizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was os important in ancient civilizations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important in ancient civilization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(writing, was important in ancient civilization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(writing, was important in ancient civilization)