xor: be historically important in networks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.53
, function
Weight: 0.46
, combination
Weight: 0.34
, difference
Weight: 0.34
, gate
Weight: 0.30
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.27
, raid
Weight: 0.27
, extraction
Weight: 0.27
, distribution
Weight: 0.27
, business activity
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be historically important in networks 1.00
be historically important in neural networks 0.87
be important in programming 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(function, be important in programming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(xor, be historically important in networks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(function, be important in programming)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in programming)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(function, be important in programming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(xor, be historically important in networks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(xor, be historically important in networks)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(xor, be historically important in neural networks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(xor, be historically important in neural networks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(xor, be historically important in neural networks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(xor, be historically important in neural networks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(xor, be historically important in networks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(xor, be historically important in networks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(function, be important in programming)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(xor, be historically important in networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(function, be important in programming)